The halachot and practices of tzniut are often the topic of confusion. While there is much room for personal expression, there are some guidelines that provide the framework for what is considered modest conduct. One fundamental guideline is called Dat Yehudit. Famously misinterpreted to mean โthe wisdom of Jewish womenโ, Dat Yehudit is more accurately translated as the โlaws of the Jewish peopleโ. Letโs delve into what this important halachic framework really entails.
Dat Yehudit originates in the Mishnah Ketubot1 where Chazal discuss the scenarios in which a woman would forfeit the money owed to her in her ketubah. In the Mishnah, two codes of law are mentioned, Dat Moshe and Dat Yehudit. The Mishnah illustrates examples of each, saying, โAnd which [behavior] is dat Moshe? She feeds him that which is not tithed, or has relations with him while nidda, or doesnโt separate challah, or vows and does not keep [her vows]. And which [behavior] is dat Yehudit? She goes out and her head is uncovered, or she spins in the marketplace, or she speaks [flirtatiously] with every man.โ2
Chazal then discuss what exactly separates these two categories. Rashba3 deduces that Dat Moshe refers to Torah prohibitions and Dat Yehudit refers to binding customs that the Jewish women have accepted upon themselves. However, this definition of Dat Moshe needs more specification, as not every Torah prohibition that a married woman commits can result in her forfeiting her ketubah money. Specifically, Dat Moshe can be understood as Torah prohibitions that also lead a womanโs husband to transgress as well. The Rosh4 also emphasizes that any personal prohibition, even a Torah one, that a married woman commits does not forfeit her ketubah money.
The Rambam5 agrees with Rashba on the fact that Dat Yehudit is a special category for women, saying โWhat is dat Yehudit? The modest behavior that the daughters of Israel have practicedโ, as does Rashi6.
As mentioned, Dat Yehudit is a category within halacha consisting of binding customs that the Jewish people (mainly married women) have taken upon themselves. The name itself alludes to this. โYehuditโ in this context simply means โJewessโ, and we know that the mitzvot donโt originally come from the Jewish people, they come from Hashem as transmitted through Moshe Rabbeinu. Thus, the โlaws of the Jewish peopleโ must refer to man-made customs.
This is all clear in theory, but in practice it can be tricky to know when the majority of women are upholding something in an area where there is not one clearly defined community, not to mention that customs can often be taught with the status of halacha, making women think that something is required of them at all times and places when it actually isnโt.
With all the above background in mind, what exactly are these binding customs of Dat Yehudit? We have three explicitly mentioned in the Mishnah, but otherwise, the parameters are rather vague. Whereas Dat Moshe is written and recorded halacha that is relevant regardless of time and community, Dat Yehudit is more fluid. Rashi7 specifies that Dat Yehudit refers to โThat which the daughters of Israel practiced, even though it is not written down.โ The Tosefot8 also specify that Dat Yehudit is โsomething that is not forbidden but regarding which the women have adopted modest practiceโ, further exemplifying its complexity.
The fluidity of Dat Yehudit creates many gray areas in its practical application. Dat Yehudit is community-centred, meaning that if the majority of women have taken a custom upon themselves, then an individual woman in that community has no power to act against it without penalty, but if the majority of women do not uphold a certain custom, then whether an individual woman wants to partake is entirely up to her, and if she chooses not to then she incurs no repercussion.
This is all clear in theory, but in practice it can be tricky to know when the majority of women are upholding something in an area where there is not one clearly defined community, not to mention that customs can often be taught with the status of halacha, making women think that something is required of them at all times and places when it actually isnโt.
Rav Moshe Feinstein cements this in a responsa9, saying, โthere is another prohibition for women from the law of dat Yehudit, that they not behave immodestly, in Ketubot 72a. But this aspect is only [a prohibition] when just she personally behaves thus. But when all the women in her city behave this way, it is not applicable to consider this โimmodestyโโ.
An interesting quality about Dat Yehudit is that the only penalty for transgressing it is to forfeit ketubah money, given that it is a set of binding customs, and not traditional halacha. Given this, an obvious question arises – are non-married Jewish women bound by Dat Yehudit? If the only context for Dat Yehudit is marriage, and the only penalty is also marriage-related, then it would follow that Dat Yehudit only applies to married women, and single women have no reason to uphold these customs.
The truth is that Dat Yehudit is applicable to all Jewish women. Even though the Mishnahโs examples pertain largely to married women, the wording of the meforshim clarify that Dat Yehudit is for โthe daughters of Israelโ, making no distinction therein. We can deduce from this that if a non-married woman were to transgress Dat Yehudit, she would bear no penalty in a Beit Din, though she would incur punishment from Shamayim.
While Dat Yehudit may not exact the same penalties as regular halacha, it would be remiss to ascribe its value to the threat of its punishment. Dat Yehudit is a revolutionary concept that puts the power of tzniut in the hands of the Jewish women. We are entrusted to come up with our own guidelines for behavior and dress, barring the thought of punishment, and further trusted to respect each communityโs special โstyleโ.
- Mishna Ketubot 7:6 โฉ๏ธ
- ibid. โฉ๏ธ
- Rashba Responsa 5:246 โฉ๏ธ
- Rosh Ketubot 7:8 โฉ๏ธ
- Mishneh Torah Ishut 24:11 โฉ๏ธ
- Rashi Sota 25a โฉ๏ธ
- Rashi Ketubot 72a s.v. Dat Yehudit โฉ๏ธ
- Tosafot Rid Ketubot 72a โฉ๏ธ
- Iggerot Moshe EH I:69 โฉ๏ธ
Related articles
- What Is Daat Moshe?
- The Torah’s Perspective on ‘Kids in Pain’
- Michal: Rebuke Is Not Necessarily Negative
- Toldot: Praying with the Fervor of a Pitchfork
- Biblical Women and Music: A Love Story
- Explaining Motherhood and Nurture Through Avraham’s Chesed
- Shatnez: The Balance between Chesed and Gevurah
- Kimchis, Tzniut and Kohanim
- Unpacking the Complex Concept of Minhag Hamakom
- Is There Room for Self-Expression in Judaism?
More articles by Jordyn Stone
- Shatnez: The Balance between Chesed and Gevurah
- Having Children: A Womanโs Sole Purpose in This World?
- Getting Married : A Womanโs Sole Purpose in this World?
- Can a Woman Dance with a Sefer Torah?
- Sukkot and Embracing Feminine Diversity
- Do Women Have the Obligation to Hear the Shofar on Rosh Hashanah?
- Forgiveness Lessons from the Story of Yosef
- Mashpia vs Mekabel: Exploring the Feminine Virtue of Receiving
- Why Do We Mourn on Tisha BโAv?
- Comparing the Greatness of Chuldah and Rachav